Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
618-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

618-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023380 50.881044)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023352 50.881041,-1.023353 50.881046,-1.023357 50.881051,-1.023363 50.881055,-1.023371 50.881058,-1.023380 50.881059,-1.023397 50.881056,-1.023403 50.881052,-1.023407 50.881047,-1.023409 50.881041,-1.023408 50.881036,-1.023404 50.881031,-1.023390 50.881024,-1.023381 50.881023,-1.023364 50.881026,-1.023358 50.881030,-1.023354 50.881035,-1.023352 50.881041)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL